In every community they'd have their own each pain points that wouldn't be solved through traditional monetization model. In a community I'm usually visited of, content creators tend to group themselves in organizations with horizontal structure, where everyone has the same amount of voice in their groups.
But this often times not really working well because whether it's ads revenue or Patreon subscription, there will be one or two person who handle the money and pay for the rest of the group, which sometimes led the group become hierarchical structure organization by the time goes by--which in return created many dogblood dramas in the community. Because of this I'm still think a healthy model of revenue share is a way to maintain groups with decentralized organization style.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
In every community they'd have their own each pain points that wouldn't be solved through traditional monetization model. In a community I'm usually visited of, content creators tend to group themselves in organizations with horizontal structure, where everyone has the same amount of voice in their groups.
But this often times not really working well because whether it's ads revenue or Patreon subscription, there will be one or two person who handle the money and pay for the rest of the group, which sometimes led the group become hierarchical structure organization by the time goes by--which in return created many dogblood dramas in the community. Because of this I'm still think a healthy model of revenue share is a way to maintain groups with decentralized organization style.